<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash, Processing, VVVV or Quartz Composer&#8230; A dilemna.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/</link>
	<description>Design, Development, Technology and My Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lalo_m</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-133095</link>
		<dc:creator>lalo_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-133095</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I&#039;m a heavy vvvv user. I&#039;ve worked with 4 screens simultaneously from 1 computer, with an ATI radeon 4550 (4 VGA outputs). vvvv has great networking capabilities, great 3d 2d graphic quality, vvvvery fast rendering (120fps). so if it only works in windows (a shame) but the advantages are much bigger. also is very fast to develop interactive aplications, and sound reactive visuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;m a heavy vvvv user. I&#8217;ve worked with 4 screens simultaneously from 1 computer, with an ATI radeon 4550 (4 VGA outputs). vvvv has great networking capabilities, great 3d 2d graphic quality, vvvvery fast rendering (120fps). so if it only works in windows (a shame) but the advantages are much bigger. also is very fast to develop interactive aplications, and sound reactive visuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: da bishop</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-103655</link>
		<dc:creator>da bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-103655</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d use a bunch of hackintoshes built to spec. You can get 8 DVI outputs from a single computer without too much trouble. Intel QX6600 chip should provide plenty grunt. 

Quartz composer will happily do this type of stuff. It supports networking and full multimedia etc, very good stuff. Flash only just introduced the ability to process audio beyond play and stop.

Sounds like you guys are a bit out of your depth, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d use a bunch of hackintoshes built to spec. You can get 8 DVI outputs from a single computer without too much trouble. Intel QX6600 chip should provide plenty grunt. </p>
<p>Quartz composer will happily do this type of stuff. It supports networking and full multimedia etc, very good stuff. Flash only just introduced the ability to process audio beyond play and stop.</p>
<p>Sounds like you guys are a bit out of your depth, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mox</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-21214</link>
		<dc:creator>mox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-21214</guid>
		<description>maybe you should look in vdmx and maxmsp...+ triple head graphic cards..etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you should look in vdmx and maxmsp&#8230;+ triple head graphic cards..etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonabwy &#187; Quartz Composer</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-19762</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonabwy &#187; Quartz Composer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-19762</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can easily see roaming into the realm of using Quartz Composer for the same kinds of effects.¬†I&#8217;m not the only one¬†that had that thought, and¬†some folks have even hacked the two to work together. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-15716</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-15716</guid>
		<description>I believe we are going to be using an array of Hippotizers for the video serving along with some scripts created in processing and possibly flash for the compositing/filtering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe we are going to be using an array of Hippotizers for the video serving along with some scripts created in processing and possibly flash for the compositing/filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-15689</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-15689</guid>
		<description>supposedly vvvv allows for easier multi-projector setups, but since vvvv itself relies on DirectX, it seems to be a Windows-only tool. Which is a shame.

The bottom line, for the hardware, is that you will need to plug those displays into something -- 32 graphics cards, with enough power behind each to run HD.

If this all acts as a single system, a central server would be nice. I suppose the &quot;server&quot; could be build into the distributed system of the computers running the screens, but I would imagine that the added complexity of development might outweights the cost of a server machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>supposedly vvvv allows for easier multi-projector setups, but since vvvv itself relies on DirectX, it seems to be a Windows-only tool. Which is a shame.</p>
<p>The bottom line, for the hardware, is that you will need to plug those displays into something &#8212; 32 graphics cards, with enough power behind each to run HD.</p>
<p>If this all acts as a single system, a central server would be nice. I suppose the &#8220;server&#8221; could be build into the distributed system of the computers running the screens, but I would imagine that the added complexity of development might outweights the cost of a server machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-13260</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-13260</guid>
		<description>Chad,

I&#039;ve been looking at Quartz Composer recently, and it has Audio patches built in, and as of Leopard, it also has network send and receive capabilities: check out one such example at http://celso.arrifana.org/archives/277-Leopards-Quartz-Composer-and-Network-events.html .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at Quartz Composer recently, and it has Audio patches built in, and as of Leopard, it also has network send and receive capabilities: check out one such example at <a href="http://celso.arrifana.org/archives/277-Leopards-Quartz-Composer-and-Network-events.html" rel="nofollow">http://celso.arrifana.org/archives/277-Leopards-Quartz-Composer-and-Network-events.html</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/comment-page-1/#comment-13254</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrinse.com/2007/12/19/flash-processing-vvvv-or-quartz-composer-a-dilemna/#comment-13254</guid>
		<description>check out openframeworks =&gt; http://www.openframeworks.cc/about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out openframeworks =&gt; <a href="http://www.openframeworks.cc/about" rel="nofollow">http://www.openframeworks.cc/about</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

